Paper detail

Atomic representations in function spaces and applications to pointwise multipliers and diffeomorphisms, a new approach

In Chapter 4 of [25] Triebel proved two theorems concerning pointwise multipliers and diffeomorphisms in function spaces of Besov and Triebel-Lizorkin type. In each case he presented two approaches, one via atoms and one via local means. While the approach via atoms was very satisfactory concerning the length and simplicity, only the rather technical approach via local means proved the theorems in full generality. In this paper we generalize two extensions of these atomic decompositions, one by Skrzypczak (see [22]) and one by Triebel and Winkelvoss (see [30]) so that we are able to give a short proof using atomic representations getting an even more general result than in the two theorems in [25]. References: [22] L. Skrzypczak. Atomic decompositions on manifolds with bounded geometry. Forum Math., 10(1):19-38, 1998. [25] H. Triebel. Theory of Function Spaces II. Birkhäuser, Basel, 1992. [30] H. Triebel and H. Winkelvoß. Intrinsic atomic characterizations of function spaces on domains. Math. Z., 221(1):647-673, 1996.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.