Paper detail

Asymptotics of Cross-Validation

Cross validation is a central tool in evaluating the performance of machine learning and statistical models. However, despite its ubiquitous role, its theoretical properties are still not well understood. We study the asymptotic properties of the cross validated-risk for a large class of models. Under stability conditions, we establish a central limit theorem and Berry-Esseen bounds, which enable us to compute asymptotically accurate confidence intervals. Using our results, we paint a big picture for the statistical speed-up of cross validation compared to a train-test split procedure. A corollary of our results is that parametric M-estimators (or empirical risk minimizers) benefit from the "full" speed-up when performing cross-validation under the training loss. In other common cases, such as when the training is done using a surrogate loss or a regularizer, we show that the behavior of the cross-validated risk is complex with a variance reduction which may be smaller or larger than the "full" speed-up, depending on the model and the underlying distribution. We allow the number of folds to grow with the number of observations at any rate.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.