Paper detail

Asymptotic Uncertainty of False Discovery Proportion for Dependent $t$-Tests

Multiple testing is a fundamental problem in high-dimensional statistical inference. Although many methods have been proposed to control false discoveries, it is still a challenging task when the tests are correlated to each other. To overcome this challenge, various methods have been proposed to estimate the false discovery rate (FDR) and/or the false discovery proportion (FDP) under arbitrary covariance among the test statistics. An interesting finding of these works is that the estimation of FDP and FDR under weak dependence is identical to that under independence. However, Mei et al. (2021) pointed out that unlike FDR, the asymptotic variance of FDP can still differ drastically from that under independence, and the difference depends on the covariance structure among the test statistics. In this paper, we further extend this result from $z$-tests to $t$-tests when the marginal variances are unknown and need to be estimated. With weakly dependent $t$-tests, we show that FDP still converges to a fixed quantity unrelated to the dependence structure, and further derive the asymptotic expansion and uncertainty of FDP leading to similar results as in Mei et al. (2021). In addition, we develop an approximation method to efficiently evaluate the asymptotic variance of FDP for dependent $t$-tests. We examine how the asymptotic variance of FDP varies as well as the performance of its estimators under different dependence structures through simulations and a real-data study.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.