Paper detail

Asymptotic Minimaxity, Optimal Posterior Concentration and Asymptotic Bayes Optimality of Horseshoe-type Priors Under Sparsity

In this article, we investigate certain asymptotic optimality properties of a very broad class of one-group continuous shrinkage priors for simultaneous estimation and testing of a sparse normal mean vector. Asymptotic optimality of Bayes estimates and posterior concentration properties corresponding to the general class of one-group priors under consideration are studied where the data is assumed to be generated according to a multivariate normal distribution with a fixed unknown mean vector. Under the assumption that the number of non-zero means is known, we show that Bayes estimators arising out of this general class of shrinkage priors under study, attain the minimax risk, up to some multiplicative constant, under the $l_2$ norm. In particular, it is shown that for the horseshoe-type priors such as the three parameter beta normal mixtures with parameters $a=0.5, b>0$ and the generalized double Pareto prior with shape parameter $α=1$, the corresponding Bayes estimates become asymptotically minimax. Moreover, posterior distributions arising out of this general class of one-group priors are shown to contract around the true mean vector at the minimax $l_2$ rate for a wide range of values of the global shrinkage parameter depending on the proportion of non-zero components of the underlying mean vector. An important and remarkable fact that emerges as a consequence of one key result essential for proving the aforesaid minimaxity result is that, within the asymptotic framework of Bogdan et al. (2011), the natural thresholding rules due to Carvalho et al. (2010) based on the horseshoe-type priors, asymptotically attain the optimal Bayes risk w.r.t. a $0-1$ loss, up to the correct multiplicative constant and are thus, asymptotically Bayes optimal under sparsity (ABOS).

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.