Paper detail

Asymptotic Generalization Bound of Fisher's Linear Discriminant Analysis

Fisher's linear discriminant analysis (FLDA) is an important dimension reduction method in statistical pattern recognition. It has been shown that FLDA is asymptotically Bayes optimal under the homoscedastic Gaussian assumption. However, this classical result has the following two major limitations: 1) it holds only for a fixed dimensionality $D$, and thus does not apply when $D$ and the training sample size $N$ are proportionally large; 2) it does not provide a quantitative description on how the generalization ability of FLDA is affected by $D$ and $N$. In this paper, we present an asymptotic generalization analysis of FLDA based on random matrix theory, in a setting where both $D$ and $N$ increase and $D/N\longrightarrowγ\in[0,1)$. The obtained lower bound of the generalization discrimination power overcomes both limitations of the classical result, i.e., it is applicable when $D$ and $N$ are proportionally large and provides a quantitative description of the generalization ability of FLDA in terms of the ratio $γ=D/N$ and the population discrimination power. Besides, the discrimination power bound also leads to an upper bound on the generalization error of binary-classification with FLDA.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.