Paper detail

Asymptotic distribution of a consistent cross-spectrum estimator based on uniformly spaced samples of a non-bandlimited process

It is well known that if the power spectral density of a continuous time stationary stochastic process does not have a compact support, data sampled from that process at any uniform sampling rate leads to biased and inconsistent spectrum estimators. In a recent paper, the authors showed that the smoothed periodogram estimator can be consistent, if the sampling interval is allowed to shrink to zero at a suitable rate as the sample size goes to infinity. In this paper, this `shrinking asymptotics' approach is used to obtain the limiting distribution of the smoothed periodogram estimator of spectra and cross-spectra. It is shown that, under suitable conditions, the scaling that ensures weak convergence of the estimator to a limiting normal random vector can range from cube-root of the sample size to square-root of the sample size, depending on the strength of the assumption made. The results are used to construct asymptotic confidence intervals for spectra and cross spectra. It is shown through a Monte-Carlo simulation study that these intervals have appropriate empirical coverage probabilities at moderate sample sizes.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.