Paper detail

Asymptotic Distribution-Free Tests for Ultra-high Dimensional Parametric Regressions via Projected Empirical Processes and $p$-value Combination

This paper develops a novel methodology for testing the goodness-of-fit of sparse parametric regression models based on projected empirical processes and p-value combination, where the covariate dimension may substantially exceed the sample size. In such ultra-high dimensional settings, traditional empirical process-based tests often fail due to the curse of dimensionality or their reliance on the asymptotic linearity and normality of parameter estimators--properties that may not hold under ultra-high dimensional scenarios. To overcome these challenges, we first extend the classic martingale transformation to ultra-high dimensional settings under mild conditions and construct a Cramer-von Mises type test based on a martingale-transformed, projected residual-marked empirical process for any projection on the unit sphere. The martingale transformation renders this projected test asymptotically distribution-free and enables us to derive its limiting distribution using only standard convergence rates of parameter estimators. While the projected test is consistent for almost all projections on the unit sphere under mild conditions, it may still suffer from power loss for specific projections. Therefore, we further employ powerful p-value combination procedures, such as the Cauchy combination, to aggregate p-values across multiple projections, thereby enhancing overall robustness. Furthermore, recognizing that empirical process-based tests excel at detecting low-frequency signals while local smoothing tests are generally superior for high-frequency alternatives, we propose a novel hybrid test that aggregates both approaches using Cauchy combination. The resulting hybrid test is powerful against both low-frequency and high-frequency alternatives. $\cdots$

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.