Paper detail

Asymmetric Independence Model for Detecting Interactions between Variables

Detecting complex interactions among risk factors in case-control studies is a fundamental task in clinical and population research. However, though hypothesis testing using logistic regression (LR) is a convenient solution, the LR framework is poorly powered and ill-suited under several common circumstances in practice including missing or unmeasured risk factors, imperfectly correlated "surrogates", and multiple disease sub-types. The weakness of LR in these settings is related to the way in which the null hypothesis is defined. Here we propose the Asymmetric Independence Model (AIM) as a biologically-inspired alternative to LR, based on the key observation that the mechanisms associated with acquiring a "disease" versus maintaining "health" are asymmetric. We prove mathematically that, unlike LR, AIM is a robust model under the abovementioned confounding scenarios. Further, we provide a mathematical definition of a "synergistic" interaction, and prove that theoretically AIM has better power than LR for such interactions. We then experimentally show the superior performance of AIM as compared to LR on both simulations and four real datasets. While the principal application here involves genetic or environmental variables in the life sciences, our methodology is readily applied to other types of measurements and inferences, e.g. in the social sciences.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.