Paper detail

Association schemes with given stratum dimensions: on a paper of Peter M. Neumann

In January 1969, Peter M. Neumann wrote a paper entitled "Primitive permutation groups of degree 3p". The main theorem placed restrictions on the parameters of a primitive but not 2-transitive permutation group of degree three times a prime. The paper was never published, and the results have been superseded by stronger theorems depending on the classification of the finite simple groups, for example a classification of primitive groups of odd degree. However, there are further reasons for being interested in this paper. First, it was written at a time when combinatorial techniques were being introduced into the theory of finite permutation groups, and the paper gives a very good summary and application of these techniques. Second, like its predecessor by Helmut Wielandt on primitive groups of degree 2p, it can be re-interpreted as a combinatorial result concerning association schemes whose common eigenspaces have dimensions of a rather limited form. This result uses neither the primality of p nor the existence of a permutation group related to the combinatorial structure. We extract these results and give details of the related combinatorics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.