Paper detail

Assessing the Memory Ability of Recurrent Neural Networks

It is known that Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) can remember, in their hidden layers, part of the semantic information expressed by a sequence (e.g., a sentence) that is being processed. Different types of recurrent units have been designed to enable RNNs to remember information over longer time spans. However, the memory abilities of different recurrent units are still theoretically and empirically unclear, thus limiting the development of more effective and explainable RNNs. To tackle the problem, in this paper, we identify and analyze the internal and external factors that affect the memory ability of RNNs, and propose a Semantic Euclidean Space to represent the semantics expressed by a sequence. Based on the Semantic Euclidean Space, a series of evaluation indicators are defined to measure the memory abilities of different recurrent units and analyze their limitations. These evaluation indicators also provide a useful guidance to select suitable sequence lengths for different RNNs during training.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.