Paper detail

Assessing the Bilingual Knowledge Learned by Neural Machine Translation Models

Machine translation (MT) systems translate text between different languages by automatically learning in-depth knowledge of bilingual lexicons, grammar and semantics from the training examples. Although neural machine translation (NMT) has led the field of MT, we have a poor understanding on how and why it works. In this paper, we bridge the gap by assessing the bilingual knowledge learned by NMT models with phrase table -- an interpretable table of bilingual lexicons. We extract the phrase table from the training examples that an NMT model correctly predicts. Extensive experiments on widely-used datasets show that the phrase table is reasonable and consistent against language pairs and random seeds. Equipped with the interpretable phrase table, we find that NMT models learn patterns from simple to complex and distill essential bilingual knowledge from the training examples. We also revisit some advances that potentially affect the learning of bilingual knowledge (e.g., back-translation), and report some interesting findings. We believe this work opens a new angle to interpret NMT with statistic models, and provides empirical supports for recent advances in improving NMT models.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.