Paper detail

Arrival Modeling and Error Analysis for Molecular Communication via Diffusion with Drift

The arrival of molecules in molecular communication via diffusion (MCvD) is a counting process, exhibiting by its nature binomial distribution. Even if the binomial process describes well the arrival of molecules, when considering consecutively sent symbols, the process struggles to work with the binomial cumulative distribution function (CDF). Therefore, in the literature, Poisson and Gaussian approximations of the binomial distribution are used. In this paper, we analyze these two approximations of the binomial model of the arrival process in MCvD with drift. Considering the distance, drift velocity, and the number of emitted molecules, we investigate the regions in which either Poisson or Gaussian model is better in terms of root mean squared error (RMSE) of the CDFs; we confirm the boundaries of the region via numerical simulations. Moreover, we derive the error probabilities for continuous communication and analyze which model approximates it more accurately.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.