Paper detail

ARES: Locally Adaptive Reconstruction-based Anomaly Scoring

How can we detect anomalies: that is, samples that significantly differ from a given set of high-dimensional data, such as images or sensor data? This is a practical problem with numerous applications and is also relevant to the goal of making learning algorithms more robust to unexpected inputs. Autoencoders are a popular approach, partly due to their simplicity and their ability to perform dimension reduction. However, the anomaly scoring function is not adaptive to the natural variation in reconstruction error across the range of normal samples, which hinders their ability to detect real anomalies. In this paper, we empirically demonstrate the importance of local adaptivity for anomaly scoring in experiments with real data. We then propose our novel Adaptive Reconstruction Error-based Scoring approach, which adapts its scoring based on the local behaviour of reconstruction error over the latent space. We show that this improves anomaly detection performance over relevant baselines in a wide variety of benchmark datasets.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.