Paper detail

Are the small neutrino oscillation parameters all related?

Neutrino oscillations reveal several small parameters, namely, $θ_{13}$, the solar mass splitting {\em vis-à-vis} the atmospheric one, and the deviation of $θ_{23}$ from maximal mixing. Can these small quantities all be traced to a single source and, if so, how could that be tested? Here a see-saw model for neutrino masses is presented wherein a dominant term generates the atmospheric mass splitting with maximal mixing in this sector, keeping $θ_{13} = 0$ and zero solar splitting. A Type-I see-saw perturbative contribution results in non-zero values of $θ_{13}$, $Δm^2_{solar}$, $θ_{12}$, as well as allows $θ_{23}$ to deviate from $π/4$ in consistency with the data while interrelating them all. CP-violation is a natural consequence and is large ($δ\sim π/2, 3π/2$) for inverted mass ordering. The model will be tested as precision on the neutrino parameters is sharpened.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.