Paper detail

AptRank: An Adaptive PageRank Model for Protein Function Prediction on Bi-relational Graphs

Diffusion-based network models are widely used for protein function prediction using protein network data and have been shown to outperform neighborhood- and module-based methods. Recent studies have shown that integrating the hierarchical structure of the Gene Ontology (GO) data dramatically improves prediction accuracy. However, previous methods usually either used the GO hierarchy to refine the prediction results of multiple classifiers, or flattened the hierarchy into a function-function similarity kernel. No study has taken the GO hierarchy into account together with the protein network as a two-layer network model. We first construct a Bi-relational graph (Birg) model comprised of both protein-protein association and function-function hierarchical networks. We then propose two diffusion-based methods, BirgRank and AptRank, both of which use PageRank to diffuse information on this two-layer graph model. BirgRank is an application of traditional PageRank with fixed decay parameters. In contrast, AptRank uses an adaptive mechanism to improve the performance of BirgRank. We evaluate both methods in predicting protein function on yeast, fly, and human datasets, and compare with four previous methods: GeneMANIA, TMC, ProteinRank and clusDCA. We design three validation strategies: missing function prediction, de novo function prediction, and guided function prediction to comprehensively evaluate all six methods. We find that both BirgRank and AptRank outperform the others, especially in missing function prediction when using only 10% of the data for training. AptRank combines protein-protein associations and the GO function-function hierarchy into a two-layer network model without flattening the hierarchy into a similarity kernel. Introducing an adaptive mechanism to the traditional, fixed-parameter model of PageRank greatly improves the accuracy of protein function prediction.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.