Paper detail

Applications of Machine Learning Methods to Quantifying Phenotypic Traits that Distinguish the Wild Type from the Mutant Arabidopsis Thaliana Seedlings during Root Gravitropism

Post-genomic research deals with challenging problems in screening genomes of organisms for particular functions or potential for being the targets of genetic engineering for desirable biological features. 'Phenotyping' of wild type and mutants is a time-consuming and costly effort by many individuals. This article is a preliminary progress report in research on large-scale automation of phenotyping steps (imaging, informatics and data analysis) needed to study plant gene-proteins networks that influence growth and development of plants. Our results undermine the significance of phenotypic traits that are implicit in patterns of dynamics in plant root response to sudden changes of its environmental conditions, such as sudden re-orientation of the root tip against the gravity vector. Including dynamic features besides the common morphological ones has paid off in design of robust and accurate machine learning methods to automate a typical phenotyping scenario, i.e. to distinguish the wild type from the mutants.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.