Application of the Principle of Maximum Conformality to the Top-Quark Forward-Backward Asymmetry at the Tevatron

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Abstract

The renormalization scale uncertainty can be eliminated by the Principle of Maximum Conformality (PMC) in a systematic scheme-independent way. Applying the PMC for the ttˉt\bar{t}-pair hadroproduction at the NNLO level, we have found that the total cross-sections σttˉσ_{t\bar{t}} at both the Tevatron and LHC remain almost unchanged when taking very disparate initial scales μRinitμ^{\rm init}_R equal to mtm_t, 10 mt10\,m_t, 20 mt20\,m_t and s\sqrt{s}, which is consistent with renormalization group invariance. As an important new application, we apply PMC scale-setting to study the top-quark forward-backward asymmetry. We observe that the more convergent perturbative series after PMC scale-setting leads to a more accurate top-quark forward-backward asymmetry. The resulting PMC prediction on the asymmetry is also free from the initial renormalization scale-dependence. Because the NLO PMC scale has a dip behavior for the (qqˉ)(q\bar{q})-channel at small subprocess collision energies, the importance of this channel to the asymmetry is increased. We observe that the asymmetries AFBttˉA_{FB}^{t\bar{t}} and AFBppˉA_{FB}^{p\bar{p}} at the Tevatron will be increased by 42% in comparison to the previous estimates obtained by using conventional scale-setting; i.e. we obtain AFBttˉ,PMC≃12.5A_{FB}^{t\bar{t},{\rm PMC}} \simeq 12.5% and AFBppˉ,PMC≃8.28A_{FB}^{p\bar{p},{\rm PMC}} \simeq 8.28%. Moreover, we obtain AFBttˉ,PMC(Mttˉ>450  GeV)≃35.0A_{FB}^{t\bar{t},{\rm PMC}}(M_{t\bar{t}}>450 \;{\rm GeV}) \simeq 35.0%. These predictions have a 1σ1σ-deviation from the present CDF and D0 measurements; the large discrepancies of the top-quark forward-backward asymmetry between the Standard Model estimate and the CDF and D0 data are thus greatly reduced.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.