Paper detail

Application of the Direct Microscopic Formalism to Nuclear Data Evaluation

We review the basic definitions of the direct microscopic formalism (DMF) and the corresponding model code TRANSNU, to describe pre-equilibrium nuclear systems, as elements of the grand canonical ensemble. We analyze its inconsistencies, especially the impossibility of exact solution of the nuclear many-body problem, and propose solutions. We use the strong dependence of pre-equilibrium emissions on the ratio of transition rates, in code ${\bf \mbox{TNG}}$, to propose a redefinition of the parameters in the master equation, and obtain smoother excitation functions in the energy regions where different exciton classes contribute. We compare the transition rates of TRANSNU with the phenomenological ones for the estimation the excitation function of a few p-induced reactions on $^{56}$Fe, and obtain reasonable descriptions for activation energy, local maxima and average magnitude. Despite the inconsistencies and a few remaining numerical problems, related with non meaningful noises in the strong oscillations of the TST, especially with the excitation energy and for low exciton number, we find the results of the present work very promising, indicating that the DFM can be used as a more precise and physically meaningful approach for the study of nuclear systems in pre-equilibrium than the traditional statistical models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.