Paper detail

Application of Lexical Features Towards Improvement of Filipino Readability Identification of Children's Literature

Proper identification of grade levels of children's reading materials is an important step towards effective learning. Recent studies in readability assessment for the English domain applied modern approaches in natural language processing (NLP) such as machine learning (ML) techniques to automate the process. There is also a need to extract the correct linguistic features when modeling readability formulas. In the context of the Filipino language, limited work has been done [1, 2], especially in considering the language's lexical complexity as main features. In this paper, we explore the use of lexical features towards improving the development of readability identification of children's books written in Filipino. Results show that combining lexical features (LEX) consisting of type-token ratio, lexical density, lexical variation, foreign word count with traditional features (TRAD) used by previous works such as sentence length, average syllable length, polysyllabic words, word, sentence, and phrase counts increased the performance of readability models by almost a 5% margin (from 42% to 47.2%). Further analysis and ranking of the most important features were shown to identify which features contribute the most in terms of reading complexity.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.