Paper detail

Application of information-percolation method to reconstruction problems on graphs

In this paper we propose a method of proving impossibility results based on applying strong data-processing inequalities to estimate mutual information between sets of variables forming certain Markov random fields. The end result is that mutual information between two "far away" (as measured by the graph distance) variables is bounded by the probability of the existence of an open path in a bond-percolation problem on the same graph. Furthermore, stronger bounds can be obtained by establishing mutual information comparison results with an erasure model on the same graph, with erasure probabilities given by the contraction coefficients. As applications, we show that our method gives sharp threshold for partially recovering a rank-one perturbation of a random Gaussian matrix (spiked Wigner model), yields the best known upper bound on the noise level for group synchronization (obtained concurrently by Abbe and Boix), and establishes new impossibility result for community detection on the stochastic block model with $k$ communities.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.