Paper detail

Antiferromagnetic Spin Fluctuations and the Pseudogap in the Paramagnetic Phases of Quasi-Two-Dimensional Organic Superconductors

We give a quantitative analysis of the published results of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments for k-(ET)2X family of organic charge transfer salts by using the phenomenological spin fluctuation model of Moriya, and Millis, Monien and Pines (M-MMP). For temperatures above T_NMR ~ 50 K, the model gives a good quantitative description of the data for the paramagnetic metallic phase of several k-(ET)2X materials, with an antiferromagnetic correlation length which increases with decreasing temperature; growing to several lattice constants by T_NMR. It is shown that the fact that the dimensionless Korringa ratio is much larger than unity is inconsistent with a broad class of theoretical models (such as dynamical mean-field theory) which neglect spatial correlations and/or vertex corrections. For materials close to the Mott insulating phase, 1/T1, Ks, and K all decrease significantly with decreasing temperature below T_NMR. This cannot be described by the M-MMP model and the most natural explanation is that a pseudogap opens up in the density of states below T_NMR, as in, for example, the cuprates. We show that the NMR measurements reported for k-(ET)2Cu2(CN)3 are qualitatively inconsistent with this material having a ground state with long range magnetic order. A pseudogap in the metallic state of organic superconductors is an important prediction of the resonating valence bond theory of superconductivity. We propose specific new experiments on organic superconductors to elucidate the nature, origin, and momentum dependence of the pseudogap and its relationship to superconductivity.

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.