Paper detail

Another Use of SMOTE for Interpretable Data Collaboration Analysis

Recently, data collaboration (DC) analysis has been developed for privacy-preserving integrated analysis across multiple institutions. DC analysis centralizes individually constructed dimensionality-reduced intermediate representations and realizes integrated analysis via collaboration representations without sharing the original data. To construct the collaboration representations, each institution generates and shares a shareable anchor dataset and centralizes its intermediate representation. Although, random anchor dataset functions well for DC analysis in general, using an anchor dataset whose distribution is close to that of the raw dataset is expected to improve the recognition performance, particularly for the interpretable DC analysis. Based on an extension of the synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE), this study proposes an anchor data construction technique to improve the recognition performance without increasing the risk of data leakage. Numerical results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed SMOTE-based method over the existing anchor data constructions for artificial and real-world datasets. Specifically, the proposed method achieves 9 percentage point and 38 percentage point performance improvements regarding accuracy and essential feature selection, respectively, over existing methods for an income dataset. The proposed method provides another use of SMOTE not for imbalanced data classifications but for a key technology of privacy-preserving integrated analysis.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.