Paper detail

Anonymity Preserving Byzantine Vector Consensus

Collecting anonymous opinions finds various applications ranging from simple whistleblowing, releasing secretive information, to complex forms of voting, where participants rank candidates by order of preferences. Unfortunately, as far as we know there is no efficient distributed solution to this problem. Previously, participants had to trust third parties, run expensive cryptographic protocols or sacrifice anonymity. In this paper, we propose a resilient-optimal solution to this problem called AVCP, which tolerates up to a third of Byzantine participants. AVCP combines traceable ring signatures to detect double votes with a reduction from vector consensus to binary consensus to ensure all valid votes are taken into account. We prove our algorithm correct and show that it preserves anonymity with at most a linear communication overhead and constant message overhead when compared to a recent consensus baseline. Finally, we demonstrate empirically that the protocol is practical by deploying it on 100 machines geo-distributed in 3 continents: America, Asia and Europe. Anonymous decisions are reached within 10 seconds with a conservative choice of traceable ring signatures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.