Paper detail

Anomalous non-additive dispersion interactions in systems of three one-dimensional wires

The non-additive dispersion contribution to the binding energy of three one-dimensional (1D) wires is investigated using wires modelled by (i) chains of hydrogen atoms and (ii) homogeneous electron gases. We demonstrate that the non-additive dispersion contribution to the binding energy is significantly enhanced compared with that expected from Axilrod-Teller-Muto-type triple-dipole summations and follows a different power-law decay with separation. The triwire non-additive dispersion for 1D electron gases scales according to the power law $d^{-β}$, where $d$ is the wire separation, with exponents $β(r_s)$ smaller than 3 and slightly increasing with $r_s$ from 2.4 at $r_s = 1$ to 2.9 at $r_s=10$, where $r_s$ is the density parameter of the 1D electron gas. This is in good agreement with the exponent $β=3$ suggested by the leading-order charge-flow contribution to the triwire non-additivity, and is a significantly slower decay than the $\sim d^{-7}$ behaviour that would be expected from triple-dipole summations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.