Paper detail

Anomalous dipion invariant mass distribution of the $Υ(4S)$ decays into $Υ(1S) π^{+} π^{-}$ and $Υ(2S) π^{+} π^{-}$

To solve the discrepancy between the experimental data on the partial widths and lineshapes of the dipion emission of $Υ(4S)$ and the theoretical predictions, we suggest that there is an additional contribution which was not taken into account in previous calculations. Noticing that the mass of $Υ(4S)$ is above the production threshold of $B\bar B$, the contribution of the sequential process $Υ(4S)\to B\bar B\to Υ(nS)+S\to Υ(nS)+π^+π^-$ ($n=1,2$) may be sizable, and its interference with that from the direct production would be important. The goal of this work is to investigate if a sum of the two contributions with a relative phase indeed reproduces the data. Our numerical results on the partial widths and the lineshapes $dΓ(Υ(4S)\to Υ(2S,1S)π^+π^-)/d(m_{π^+π^-})$ are satisfactorily consistent with the measurements, thus the role of this mechanism is confirmed. Moreover, with the parameters obtained by fitting the data of the Belle and Babar collaborations, we predict the distributions $dΓ(Υ(4S)\to Υ(2S,1S)π^+π^-)/d\cosθ$ which have not been measured yet.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.