Paper detail

Anisotropic radiation from accretion disc-coronae in active galactic nuclei

In the unification scheme of active galactic nuclei (AGN), Seyfert 1s and Seyfert 2s are intrinsically same, but they are viewed at different angles. However, the Fe Kαemission line luminosity of Seyfert 1s was found in average to be about twice of that of Seyfert 2s at given X-ray continuum luminosity in the previous work (Ricci et al. 2014). We construct an accretion disc-corona model, in which a fraction of energy dissipated in the disc is extracted to heat the corona above the disc. The radiation transfer equation containing Compton scattering processes is an integro-differential equation, which is solved numerically for the corona with a parallel plane geometry. We find that the specific intensity of X-ray radiation from the corona changes little with the viewing angle θwhen θis small (nearly face-on), and it is sensitive to θif the viewing angle is large (θ> 40 degrees). The radiation from the cold disc, mostly in infrared/optical/UV bands, is almost proportional to cosθwhen θ< 40 degrees, while it decreases more rapidly than cosθwhen θ> 40 degrees because of strong absorption in the corona in this case. For seyfert galaxies, the Fe Kαline may probably be emitted from the disc irradiated by the X-ray continuum emission. The observed equivalent width (EW) difference between Seyfert 1s and Seyfert 2s can be reproduced by our model calculations, provided Seyfert 1s are observed in nearly face-on direction and the average inclination angle of Seyfert 2s ~65 dgrees.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.