Paper detail

Angelfish: Leader, DAG, or Anywhere in Between

To maximize performance, many modern blockchain systems rely on eventually-synchronous, Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) consensus protocols. Two protocol designs have emerged in this space: protocols that minimize latency using a leader that drives both data dissemination and consensus, and protocols that maximize throughput using a separate, asynchronous data dissemination layer. Recent protocols such as Partially-Synchronous Bullshark and Sailfish combine elements of both approaches by using a DAG to enable parallel data dissemination and a leader that paces DAG formation. This improves latency while achieving state-of-the-art throughput. However, the DAG-formation process of those protocols imposes overheads that prevent matching the latency possible with a leader-based protocol. We present Angelfish, a hybrid protocol that adapts smoothly across this design space, from leader-based to DAG-based consensus. Angelfish lets a dynamically-adjusted subset of parties use best-effort broadcast to issue lightweight votes instead of using a costlier reliably broadcast to create DAG vertices. This reduces communication, tolerates more lagging nodes, and lowers latency in practice compared to prior DAG-based protocols. Our empirical evaluation shows that Angelfish attains state-of-the-art peak throughput while matching the latency of leader-based protocols under moderate throughput, delivering the best of both worlds. The implementation is open-sourced and publicly available.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.