Paper detail

ANDROMEDA: An FPGA Based RISC-V MPSoC Exploration Framework

With the growing demands of consumer electronic products, the computational requirements are increasing exponentially. Due to the applications' computational needs, the computer architects are trying to pack as many cores as possible on a single die for accelerated execution of the application program codes. In a multiprocessor system-on-chip (MPSoC), striking a balance among the number of cores, memory subsystems, and network-on-chip parameters is essential to attain the desired performance. In this paper, we present ANDROMEDA, a RISC-V based framework that allows us to explore the different configurations of an MPSoC and observe the performance penalties and gains. We emulate the various configurations of MPSoC on the Synopsys HAPS-80D Dual FPGA platform. Using STREAM, matrix multiply, and N-body simulations as benchmarks, we demonstrate our framework's efficacy in quickly identifying the right parameters for efficient execution of these benchmarks.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.