Paper detail

Analytical treatment of long-term observations of the day-night asymmetry for solar neutrinos

The Earth's density distribution can be approximately considered piecewise continuous at the scale of two-flavor oscillations of typical solar neutrinos, such as the beryllium-7 and boron-8 neutrinos. This quite general assumption appears to be enough to analytically calculate the day-night asymmetry factor for such neutrinos. Using the explicit time averaging procedure, we show that, within the leading-order approximation, this factor is determined by the electron density within about one oscillation length under the detector, namely, in the Earth's crust (and upper mantle for high-energy neutrinos). We also evaluate the effect of the inner Earth's structure on the observed asymmetry and show that it is suppressed and mainly comes from the neutrinos observed near the winter and summer solstices. As a result, we arrive at the strict interval constraint on the asymmetry, which is valid within quite a wide class of Earth models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.