Paper detail

Analytical percolation theory for topological color codes under qubit loss

Quantum information theory has shown strong connections with classical statistical physics. For example, quantum error correcting codes like the surface and the color code present a tolerance to qubit loss that is related to the classical percolation threshold of the lattices where the codes are defined. Here we explore such connection to study analytically the tolerance of the color code when the protocol introduced in [Phys. Rev. Lett. $\textbf{121}$, 060501 (2018)] to correct qubit losses is applied. This protocol is based on the removal of the lost qubit from the code, a neighboring qubit, and the lattice edges where these two qubits reside. We first obtain analytically the average fraction of edges $ r(p) $ that the protocol erases from the lattice to correct a fraction $ p $ of qubit losses. Then, the threshold $ p_c $ below which the logical information is protected corresponds to the value of $ p $ at which $ r(p) $ equals the bond-percolation threshold of the lattice. Moreover, we prove that the logical information is protected if and only if the set of lost qubits does not include the entire support of any logical operator. The results presented here open a route to an analytical understanding of the effects of qubit losses in topological quantum error codes.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.