Paper detail

Analysis of the Independent Particle Model approach to Nuclear Densities

We present an analysis of the use of the Darwin-Fowler approximation in connection with the statistical IPM, by comparing the results of our recent studies with the occupation number approach (OCN) and some traditional statistical independent particle model (IPM) approaches. The analysis of level density works based on the statistical IPM reveals that the use of the the Darwin-Fowler approximation, in some of them, is theoretically inconsistent and some of their results should rather be considered as theoretical coincidences with other consistent approaches, than proofs of their validity. We conclude that, in general, the use of the Darwin-Fowler approximation with the statistical IPM should be used criteriously or, if possible, avoided altogether and suggest that the combinatorial IPM approaches have important advantages over the other models and formalisms analyzed in this paper, especially regarding the consistency of the microscopic description of the nuclear structure and dynamics of non highly excited systems.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.