Paper detail

Analysis of the gradual transition from the near to the far field in single-slit diffraction

In Optics it is common to split up the formal analysis of diffraction according to two convenient approximations, in the near and far fields (also known as the Fresnel and Fraunhofer regimes, respectively). Within this scenario, geometrical optics, the optics describing the light phenomena observable in our everyday life, is introduced as the short-wavelength limit of near-field phenomena, assuming that the typical size of the aperture (or obstacle) that light is incident on is much larger than the light wavelength. With the purpose to provide an alternative view on how geometrical optics fits within the context of the diffraction theory, particularly how it emerges, the transition from the near to the far field is revisited here both analytically and numerically. Accordingly, first this transition is investigated in the case of Gaussian beam diffraction, since its full analyticity paves the way for a better understanding of the paradigmatic (and typical) case of diffraction by sharp-edged single slits. This latter case is then tackled both analytically, by means of some insightful approximations and guesses, and numerically. As it is shown, this analysis makes explicit the influence of the various parameters involved in diffraction processes, such as the typical size of the input (diffracted) wave or its wavelength, or the distance between the input and output planes. Moreover, analytical expressions have been determined for the critical turnover value of the slit width that separates typical Fraunhofer diffraction regimes from the behaviors eventually leading to the geometrical optics limit, finding a good agreement with both numerically simulated results and experimental data extracted from the literature.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.