Paper detail

Analysis of probing techniques for sparse approximation and trace estimation of decaying matrix functions

The computation of matrix functions $f(A)$, or related quantities like their trace, is an important but challenging task, in particular for large and sparse matrices $A$. In recent years, probing methods have become an often considered tool in this context, as they allow to replace the computation of $f(A)$ or $\text{tr}(f(A))$ by the evaluation of (a small number of) quantities of the form $f(A)v$ or $v^Tf(A)v$, respectively. These tasks can then efficiently be solved by standard techniques like, e.g., Krylov subspace methods. It is well-known that probing methods are particularly efficient when $f(A)$ is approximately sparse, e.g., when the entries of $f(A)$ show a strong off-diagonal decay, but a rigorous error analysis is lacking so far. In this paper we develop new theoretical results on the existence of sparse approximations for $f(A)$ and error bounds for probing methods based on graph colorings. As a by-product, by carefully inspecting the proofs of these error bounds, we also gain new insights into when to stop the Krylov iteration used for approximating $f(A)v$ or $v^Tf(A)v$, thus allowing for a practically efficient implementation of the probing methods.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.