Researcher profile

Marcel Schweitzer

Marcel Schweitzer contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Analysis of probing techniques for sparse approximation and trace estimation of decaying matrix functions

The computation of matrix functions $f(A)$, or related quantities like their trace, is an important but challenging task, in particular for large and sparse matrices $A$. In recent years, probing methods have become an often considered tool in this context, as they allow to replace the computation of $f(A)$ or $\text{tr}(f(A))$ by the evaluation of (a small number of) quantities of the form $f(A)v$ or $v^Tf(A)v$, respectively. These tasks can then efficiently be solved by standard techniques like, e.g., Krylov subspace methods. It is well-known that probing methods are particularly efficient when $f(A)$ is approximately sparse, e.g., when the entries of $f(A)$ show a strong off-diagonal decay, but a rigorous error analysis is lacking so far. In this paper we develop new theoretical results on the existence of sparse approximations for $f(A)$ and error bounds for probing methods based on graph colorings. As a by-product, by carefully inspecting the proofs of these error bounds, we also gain new insights into when to stop the Krylov iteration used for approximating $f(A)v$ or $v^Tf(A)v$, thus allowing for a practically efficient implementation of the probing methods.

preprint2020arXiv

Computing low-rank approximations of the Fréchet derivative of a matrix function using Krylov subspace methods

The Fréchet derivative $L_f(A,E)$ of the matrix function $f(A)$ plays an important role in many different applications, including condition number estimation and network analysis. We present several different Krylov subspace methods for computing low-rank approximations of $L_f(A,E)$ when the direction term $E$ is of rank one (which can easily be extended to general low-rank). We analyze the convergence of the resulting method for the important special case that $A$ is Hermitian and $f$ is either the exponential, the logarithm or a Stieltjes function. In a number of numerical tests, both including matrices from benchmark collections and from real-world applications, we demonstrate and compare the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed methods.

preprint2020arXiv

Low-rank updates of matrix functions II: Rational Krylov methods

This work develops novel rational Krylov methods for updating a large-scale matrix function f(A) when A is subject to low-rank modifications. It extends our previous work in this context on polynomial Krylov methods, for which we present a simplified convergence analysis. For the rational case, our convergence analysis is based on an exactness result that is connected to work by Bernstein and Van Loan on rank-one updates of rational matrix functions. We demonstrate the usefulness of the derived error bounds for guiding the choice of poles in the rational Krylov method for the exponential function and Markov functions. Low-rank updates of the matrix sign function require additional attention; we develop and analyze a combination of our methods with a squaring trick for this purpose. A curious connection between such updates and existing rational Krylov subspace methods for Sylvester matrix equations is pointed out.