Paper detail

Analysis of Leading Communities Contributing to arXiv Information Distribution on Twitter

To analyze the impact that arXiv is having on the world, in this paper we propose an arXiv information distribution model on Twitter, which has a three-layer structure: arXiv papers, information spreaders, and information collectors. First, we use the HITS algorithm to analyze the arXiv information diffusion network with users as nodes, which is created from three types of behavior on Twitter regarding arXiv papers: tweeting, retweeting, and liking. Next, we extract communities from the network of information spreaders with positive authority and hub degrees using the Louvain method, and analyze the relationship and roles of information spreaders in communities using research field, linguistic, and temporal characteristics. From our analysis using the tweet and arXiv datasets, we found that information about arXiv papers circulates on Twitter from information spreaders to information collectors, and that multiple communities of information spreaders are formed according to their research fields. It was also found that different communities were formed in the same research field, depending on the research or cultural background of the information spreaders. We were able to identify two types of key persons: information spreaders who lead the relevant field in the international community and information spreaders who bridge the regional and international communities using English and their native language. In addition, we found that it takes some time to gain trust as an information spreader.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.