Paper detail

Analysis of Coronavirus Envelope Protein with Cellular Automata (CA) Model

The reason of significantly higher transmissibility of SARS Covid (2019 CoV-2) compared to SARS Covid (2003 CoV) and MERS Covid (2012 MERS) can be attributed to mutations reported in structural proteins, and the role played by non-structural proteins (nsps) and accessory proteins (ORFs) for viral replication, assembly, and shedding. Envelope protein E is one of the four structural proteins of minimum length. Recent studies have confirmed critical role played by the envelope protein in the viral life cycle including assembly of virion exported from infected cell for its transmission. However, the determinants of the highly complex viral - host interactions of envelope protein, particularly with host Golgi complex, have not been adequately characterized. CoV-2 and CoV Envelope proteins of length 75 and 76 amino acids differ in four amino acid locations. The additional amino acid Gly (G) at location 70 makes CoV length 76. The amino acid pair EG at location 69-70 of CoV in place of amino acid R in location 69 of CoV-2, has been identified as a major determining factor in the current investigation. This paper concentrates on the design of computational model to compare the structure/function of wild and mutants of CoV-2 with wild and mutants of CoV in the functionally important region of the protein chain pair. We hypothesize that differences of CAML model parameter of CoV-2 and CoV characterize the deviation in structure and function of envelope proteins in respect of interaction of virus with host Golgi complex; and this difference gets reflected in the difference of their transmissibility. The hypothesis has been validated from single point mutational study on- (i) human HBB beta-globin hemoglobin protein associated with sickle cell anemia, (ii) mutants of envelope protein of Covid-2 infected patients reported in recent publications.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.