Paper detail

Analysing surveys of our Galaxy -- II. Determining the potential

We consider the problem of determining the Galaxy's gravitational potential from a star catalogue. We show that orbit-based approaches to this problem suffer from unacceptable numerical noise deriving from the use of only a finite number of orbits. An alternative approach, which requires an ability to determine the model's phase-space density at predetermined positions and velocities, has a level of numerical noise that lies well below the intrinsic uncertainty associated with the finite size of the catalogue analysed. A catalogue of 10000 stars brighter than V=17 and distributed over the sky at b>30 degrees enables us to determine the scaleheight of the disc that contributes to the potential with an uncertainty below 20pc if the catalogue gives proper motions, line-of-sight velocities and parallaxes with errors typical of the Gaia Catalogue, rising to 36pc if only proper motions are available. The uncertainty in the disc's scalelength is significantly smaller than 0.25kpc.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.