BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

James J. Binney

James J. Binney contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - Baseline
4works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Analysing surveys of our Galaxy -- II. Determining the potential

We consider the problem of determining the Galaxy's gravitational potential from a star catalogue. We show that orbit-based approaches to this problem suffer from unacceptable numerical noise deriving from the use of only a finite number of orbits. An alternative approach, which requires an ability to determine the model's phase-space density at predetermined positions and velocities, has a level of numerical noise that lies well below the intrinsic uncertainty associated with the finite size of the catalogue analysed. A catalogue of 10000 stars brighter than V=17 and distributed over the sky at b>30 degrees enables us to determine the scaleheight of the disc that contributes to the potential with an uncertainty below 20pc if the catalogue gives proper motions, line-of-sight velocities and parallaxes with errors typical of the Gaia Catalogue, rising to 36pc if only proper motions are available. The uncertainty in the disc's scalelength is significantly smaller than 0.25kpc.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Kinematics and history of the solar neighbourhood revisited

We use proper motions and parallaxes from the new reduction of Hipparcos data and Geneva-Copenhagen radial velocities for a complete sample of ~15000 main-sequence and subgiant stars, and new Padova isochrones to constrain the kinematics and star-formation history of the solar neighbourhood. We rederive the solar motion and the structure of the local velocity ellipsoids. When the principal velocity dispersions are assumed to increase with time as t^β, the index βis larger for σ_W (β_W~0.45) than for σ_U (β_U~0.31). For the three-dimensional velocity dispersion we obtain β=0.35. We exclude saturation of disc heating after ~3 Gyr as proposed by Quillen & Garnett(2000). Saturation after >~4 Gyr combined with an abrupt increase in velocity dispersion for the oldest stars cannot be excluded. For all our models the star-formation rate is declining, being a factor 2-7 lower now than it was at the beginning. Models in which the SFR declines exponentially favour very high disc ages between 11.5 and 13 Gyr and exclude ages below ~10.5 Gyr as they yield worse fits to the number density and velocity dispersion of red stars. Models in which the SFR is the sum of two declining exponentials representing the thin and thick discs favour ages between 10.5 and 12 Gyr with a lower limit of ~10.0 Gyr. Although in our models the star-formation rate peaked surprisingly early, the mean formation time of solar-neighbourhood stars is later than in ab-initio models of galaxy formation, probably on account of weaknesses in such models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

The dangers of deprojection of proper motions

We re-examine the method of deprojection of proper motions, which has been used for finding the velocity ellipsoid of stars in the nearby Galaxy. This method is only legitimate if the lines of sight to the individual stars are uncorrelated with the stars' velocities. Very simple models are used to show that spurious results similar to ones recently reported are obtained when velocity dispersion decreases with galactocentric radius in the expected way. A scheme that compensates for this bias is proposed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

The uncertainty in Galactic parameters

We reanalyse the measurements of parallax, proper motion, and line-of-sight velocity for 18 masers in high mass star-forming regions presented by Reid et al. (2009). We use a likelihood analysis to investigate the distance of the Sun from the Galactic centre, R_0, the rotational speed of the local standard of rest, v_0, and the peculiar velocity of the Sun, vsol, for various models of the rotation curve, and models which allow for a typical peculiar motion of the high mass star-forming regions. We find that these data are best fit by models with non-standard values for vsol or a net peculiar motion of the high mass star-forming regions. We argue that a correction to vsol is much more likely, and that these data support the conclusion of Binney (2009) that V_sol should be revised upwards from 5.2 km/s to 11 km/s. We find that the values of R_0 and v_0 that we determine are heavily dependent on the model we use for the rotation curve, with model-dependent estimates of R_0 ranging from 6.7 \pm 0.5kpc to 8.9 \pm 0.9kpc, and those of v_0 ranging from 200 \pm 20 km/s to 279 \pm 33 km/s. We argue that these data cannot be thought of as implying any particular values of R_0 or v_0. However, we find that v_0/R_0 is better constrained, lying in the range 29.9-31.6 km/s/kpc for all models but one.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access