Paper detail

An upper bound for the nonsolvable length of a finite group in terms of its shortest law

Every finite group $G$ has a normal series each of whose factors is either a solvable group or a direct product of non-abelian simple groups. The minimum number of nonsolvable factors, attained on all possible such series in $G$, is called the \emph{nonsolvable length} $λ(G)$ of $G$. In the present paper, we prove a theorem about permutation representations of groups of fixed nonsolvable length. As a consequence, we show that in a finite group of nonsolvable length at least $n$, no non-trivial word of length at most $n$ (in any number of variables) can be a law. This result is then used to give a bound on $λ(G)$ in terms of the length of the shortest law of $G$, thus confirming a conjecture of Larsen. Moreover our Theorem C can be used to give a positive answer, in the case $p=2$, to a problem raised by Khukhro and Shumyatsky, concerning the non-$p$-solvable length of finite groups.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.