Paper detail

An unbiased estimate for the mean of a {0,1} random variable with relative error distribution independent of the mean

Say $X_1,X_2,\ldots$ are independent identically distributed Bernoulli random variables with mean $p$. This paper builds a new estimate $\hat p$ of $p$ that has the property that the relative error, $\hat p /p - 1$, of the estimate does not depend in any way on the value of $p$. This allows the construction of exact confidence intervals for $p$ of any desired level without needing any sort of limit or approximation. In addition, $\hat p$ is unbiased. For $ε$ and $δ$ in $(0,1)$, to obtain an estimate where $\mathbb{P}(|\hat p/p - 1| > ε) \leq δ$, the new algorithm takes on average at most $2ε^{-2} p^{-1}\ln(2δ^{-1})(1 - (14/3) ε)^{-1}$ samples. It is also shown that any such algorithm that applies whenever $p \leq 1/2$ requires at least $0.2ε^{-2} p^{-1}\ln((2-δ)δ^{-1})(1 + 2 ε)$ samples. The same algorithm can also be applied to estimate the mean of any random variable that falls in $[0,1]$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.