Paper detail

An investigation of CME dynamics, productivity and source-region subsurface structure

This work is to study the dynamics of coronal mass ejections and to investigate possible correlation between CME productivity and subsurface structure. Two CMEs and six active regions are selected for the study. The CMEs are examined by comparing observations and theoretical models, and the subsurface structures are probed by local helioseismic inversions. The analysis of the CMEs shows that the eruptive flux-rope model is in good agreement with both events. However, some discrepancies with the observation are also found, indicating that the model can be further improved. The helioseismic investigation results indicate a consistent correlation between the CME productivity and the subsurface temperature structure. The inferred subsurface magnetic structure reveals that the source regions of the two studied CMEs may share similar subsurface structures. Not found in the other CME productive regions selected for consideration, however, the similarity in the subsurface features may indicate the presence of a subsurface structural connection betweenthe two closely located and CME-productive regions.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.