Source author record

Chia-Hsien Lin

Chia-Hsien Lin appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Existence of The Closed Magnetic Field Lines Crossing The Coronal Hole Boundaries

Coronal holes (CHs) are regions with unbalanced magnetic flux, and have been associated with open magnetic field (OMF) structures. However, it has been reported that some CHs do not intersect with OMF regions. To investigate the inconsistency, we apply a potential-field (PF) model to construct the magnetic fields of the coronal holes. As a comparison, we also use a thermodynamic magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model to synthesize coronal images, and identify CHs from the synthetic images. The results from both the potential-field CHs and synthetic MHD CHs reveal that there is a significant percentage of closed field lines extending beyond the CH boundaries and more than 50% (17%) of PF (MHD) CHs do not contain OMF lines. The boundary-crossing field lines are more likely to be found in the lower latitudes during active times. While they tend to be located slightly closer than the non-boundary-crossing ones to the CH boundaries, nearly 40% (20%) of them in PF (MHD) CHs are not located in the boundary regions. The CHs without open field lines are often smaller and less unipolar than those with open field lines. The MHD model indicates higher temperature variations along the boundary-crossing field lines than the non-boundary crossing ones. The main difference between the results of the two models is that the dominant field lines in the PF and MHD CHs are closed and open field lines, respectively.

preprint2012arXiv

An investigation of CME dynamics, productivity and source-region subsurface structure

This work is to study the dynamics of coronal mass ejections and to investigate possible correlation between CME productivity and subsurface structure. Two CMEs and six active regions are selected for the study. The CMEs are examined by comparing observations and theoretical models, and the subsurface structures are probed by local helioseismic inversions. The analysis of the CMEs shows that the eruptive flux-rope model is in good agreement with both events. However, some discrepancies with the observation are also found, indicating that the model can be further improved. The helioseismic investigation results indicate a consistent correlation between the CME productivity and the subsurface temperature structure. The inferred subsurface magnetic structure reveals that the source regions of the two studied CMEs may share similar subsurface structures. Not found in the other CME productive regions selected for consideration, however, the similarity in the subsurface features may indicate the presence of a subsurface structural connection betweenthe two closely located and CME-productive regions.

preprint2010arXiv

Investigating the driving mechanisms of coronal mass ejections

The objective of this investigation was to first examine the kinematics of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) using EUV and coronagraph images, and then to make a comparison with theoretical models in the hope to identify the driving mechanisms of the CMEs. We have studied two CMEs which occurred on 2006 Dec. 17 (CME06) and 2007 Dec. 31 (CME07). The models studied in this work were catastrophe, breakout, and toroidal instability models. We found that after the eruption, the accelerations of both events exhibited a drop before increasing again. Our comparisons with the theories suggested that CME06 can be best described by a hybrid of the catastrophe and breakout models while CME07 is most consistent with the breakout model.