Paper detail

An intrinsic characterization of five points in a $\mathrm{CAT}(0)$ space

Gromov (2001) and Sturm (2003) proved that any four points in a $\mathrm{CAT}(0)$ space satisfy a certain family of inequalities. We call those inequalities the $\boxtimes$-inequalities, following the notation used by Gromov. In this paper, we prove that a metric space $X$ containing at most five points admits an isometric embedding into a $\mathrm{CAT}(0)$ space if and only if any four points in $X$ satisfy the $\boxtimes$-inequalities. To prove this, we introduce a new family of necessary conditions for a metric space to admit an isometric embedding into a $\mathrm{CAT}(0)$ space by modifying and generalizing Gromov's cycle conditions. Furthermore, we prove that if a metric space satisfies all those necessary conditions, then it admits an isometric embedding into a $\mathrm{CAT}(0)$ space. This work presents a new approach to characterizing those metric spaces that admit an isometric embedding into a $\mathrm{CAT}(0)$ space.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.