Paper detail

An Interpretation of the Moore-Penrose Generalized Inverse of a Singular Fisher Information Matrix

It is proved that in a non-Bayesian parametric estimation problem, if the Fisher information matrix (FIM) is singular, unbiased estimators for the unknown parameter will not exist. Cramer-Rao bound (CRB), a popular tool to lower bound the variances of unbiased estimators, seems inapplicable in such situations. In this paper, we show that the Moore-Penrose generalized inverse of a singular FIM can be interpreted as the CRB corresponding to the minimum variance among all choices of minimum constraint functions. This result ensures the logical validity of applying the Moore-Penrose generalized inverse of an FIM as the covariance lower bound when the FIM is singular. Furthermore, the result can be applied as a performance bound on the joint design of constraint functions and unbiased estimators.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.