Paper detail

An information upper bound for probability sensitivity

Uncertain input of a mathematical model induces uncertainties in the output and probabilistic sensitivity analysis identifies the influential inputs to guide decision-making. Of practical concern is the probability that the output would, or would not, exceed a threshold, and the probability sensitivity depends on this threshold which is often uncertain. The Fisher information and the Kullback-Leibler divergence have been recently proposed in the literature as threshold-independent sensitivity metrics. We present mathematical proof that the information-theoretical metrics provide an upper bound for the probability sensitivity. The proof is elementary, relying only on a special version of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality called Titu's lemma. Despite various inequalities exist for probabilities, little is known of probability sensitivity bounds and the one proposed here is new to the present authors' knowledge. The probability sensitivity bound is extended, analytically and with numerical examples, to the Fisher information of both the input and output. It thus provides a solid mathematical basis for decision-making based on probabilistic sensitivity metrics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.