Paper detail

An information measure for comparing top $k$ lists

Comparing the top $k$ elements between two or more ranked results is a common task in many contexts and settings. A few measures have been proposed to compare top $k$ lists with attractive mathematical properties, but they face a number of pitfalls and shortcomings in practice. This work introduces a new measure to compare any two top k lists based on measuring the information these lists convey. Our method investigates the compressibility of the lists, and the length of the message to losslessly encode them gives a natural and robust measure of their variability. This information-theoretic measure objectively reconciles all the main considerations that arise when measuring (dis-)similarity between lists: the extent of their non-overlapping elements in each of the lists; the amount of disarray among overlapping elements between the lists; the measurement of displacement of actual ranks of their overlapping elements.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.