Paper detail

An incremental approach to unravel the neutrino mass hierarchy and CP violation with a long-baseline Superbeam for large $θ_{13}$

Recent data from long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments have provided new information on θ_{13}, hinting that 0.01\lesssim sin^2 2θ_{13} \lesssim 0.1 at 2 sigma C.L. Confirmation of this result with high significance will have a crucial impact on the optimization of the future long-baseline oscillation experiments designed to probe the neutrino mass ordering and leptonic CP violation. In this context, we expound in detail the physics reach of an experimental setup where neutrinos produced in a conventional wide-band beam facility at CERN are observed in a proposed Giant Liquid Argon detector at the Pyhäsalmi mine, at a distance of 2290 km. This particular setup would have unprecedented sensitivity to the mass ordering and CP violation in the light of large θ_{13}. With a 10 to 20 kt `pilot' detector and just a few years of neutrino beam running, the mass hierarchy could be determined, irrespective of the true values of δ_{CP} and the mass hierarchy, at 3 sigma (5 sigma) C.L. if sin^2 2θ_{13}(true) = 0.05 (0.1). With the same exposure, we start to have 3 sigma sensitivity to CP violation if sin^2 2θ_{13}(true) > 0.05, in particular testing maximally CP-violating scenarios at a high C.L. After optimizing the neutrino and anti-neutrino running fractions, we study the performance of the setup as a function of the exposure, identifying three milestones to have roughly 30%, 50% and 70% coverage in δ_{CP}(true) for 3 sigma CP violation discovery. For comparison, we also study the CERN to Slanic baseline of 1540 km. This work demonstrates that an incremental program, staged in terms of the exposure, can achieve the desired physics goals within a realistically feasible timescale, and produce significant new results at each stage.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.