Paper detail

An In-Module Disturbance Barrier for Mitigating Write Disturbance in Phase-Change Memory

Write disturbance error (WDE) appears as a serious reliability problem preventing phase-change memory (PCM) from general commercialization, and therefore several studies have been proposed to mitigate WDEs. Verify-and-correction (VnC) eliminates WDEs by always verifying the data correctness on neighbors after programming, but incurs significant performance overhead. Encoding-based schemes mitigate WDEs by reducing the number of WDE-vulnerable data patterns; however, mitigation performance notably fluctuates with applications. Moreover, encoding-based schemes still rely on VnC-based schemes. Cache-based schemes lower WDEs by storing data in a write cache, but it requires several megabytes of SRAM to significantly mitigate WDEs. Despite the efforts of previous studies, these methods incur either significant performance or area overhead. Therefore, a new approach, which does not rely on VnC-based schemes or application data patterns, is highly necessary. Furthermore, the new approach should be transparent to processors (i.e., in-module), because the characteristic of WDEs is determined by manufacturers of PCM products. In this paper, we present an in-module disturbance barrier (IMDB) that mitigates WDEs on demand. IMDB includes a two-level hierarchy comprising two SRAM-based tables, whose entries are managed with a dedicated replacement policy that sufficiently utilizes the characteristics of WDEs. The naive implementation of the replacement policy requires hundreds of read ports on SRAM, which is infeasible in real hardware; hence, an approximate comparator is also designed. We also conduct a rigorous exploration of architecture parameters to obtain a cost-effective design. The proposed method significantly reduces WDEs without noticeable speed degradation or additional energy consumption compared to previous methods.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.