Paper detail

An Improved Greedy Algorithm for Subset Selection in Linear Estimation

In this paper, we consider a subset selection problem in a spatial field where we seek to find a set of k locations whose observations provide the best estimate of the field value at a finite set of prediction locations. The measurements can be taken at any location in the continuous field, and the covariance between the field values at different points is given by the widely used squared exponential covariance function. One approach for observation selection is to perform a grid discretization of the space and obtain an approximate solution using the greedy algorithm. The solution quality improves with a finer grid resolution but at the cost of increased computation. We propose a method to reduce the computational complexity, or conversely to increase solution quality, of the greedy algorithm by considering a search space consisting only of prediction locations and centroids of cliques formed by the prediction locations. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach in simulation, both in terms of solution quality and runtime.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.