Paper detail

An improved algorithm and a Fortran 90 module for computing the conical function $P^m_{-1/2+iτ}(x)$

In this paper we describe an algorithm and a Fortran 90 module ({\bf Conical}) for the computation of the conical function $P^m_{-\tfrac12+iτ}(x)$ for $x>-1$, $m \ge 0$, $τ>0$. These functions appear in the solution of Dirichlet problems for domains bounded by cones; because of this, they are involved in a large number of applications in Engineering and Physics. In the Fortran 90 module, the admissible parameter ranges for computing the conical functions in standard IEEE double precision arithmetic are restricted to $(x,m,τ) \in (-1,1) \times [0,\,40] \times [0,\,100]$ and $(x,m,τ) \in (1,100) \times [0,\,100] \times [0,\,100]$. Based on tests of the three-term recurrence relation satisfied by these functions and direct comparison with Maple, we claim a relative accuracy close to $10^{-12}$ in the full parameter range, although a mild loss of accuracy can be found at some points of the oscillatory region of the conical functions. The relative accuracy increases to $10^{-13}\,-\,10^{-14}$ in the region of the monotonic regime of the functions where integral representations are computed ($-1<x<0$).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.